Learn / AI Training Foundations / Module 6 · 10 min

Writing, Style & Evaluation Justifications

A good decision is easier to trust when the reasoning is clear

Many evaluation tasks ask for a short explanation. The goal is not to write an essay; it is to identify the most important evidence supporting your judgment.

Decision → Evidence → Impact

  • Decision: state which response is stronger or what issue exists
  • Evidence: identify the exact detail
  • Impact: explain why that detail matters under the rubric

Weak vs. strong feedback

Weak

  • A is better.
  • B feels weird.
  • This is bad.

Strong

  • Response A is stronger because it answers both requested parts, while Response B addresses only the first.
  • The response uses technical jargon even though the user requested a beginner explanation.

Good evaluation writing is

  • Specific
  • Evidence-based
  • Concise
  • Neutral
  • Tied to the rubric

Tone and audience

If the user asks for a professional email, slang may be inappropriate even if the message is understandable. If the user asks for a friendly text to a close friend, a highly formal tone may be less suitable.

Module summary

  • Explain the most important reason, not every possible nitpick.
  • Use evidence from the response.
  • Keep tone neutral.
  • Differentiate rubric violations from personal style preferences.

Quick check

Which feedback is stronger?

Quick check

Should personal preference override the rubric?

Quick check

What comes after evidence in the suggested framework?